anil.kudumulap@gmail.com
06-22 12:31 AM
Thank you.
wallpaper Funny Christmas Card
-soad-
08-23 11:58 PM
hmm?i am also intrested in that.
gc_hanged
01-05 06:22 AM
After The Fall: Making Sense Out Of Sensenbrenner by Gary Endelman (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2006,0104-endelman.shtm#bio)
Now we know how Tom Paine felt at Valley Forge. It has been a cold December for those who think immigration is good for America. On December 16th, the House of Representatives approved the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005(H.R.4437), perhaps the most draconian bill of recent memory, and, a mere three days later, the House approved an agreement with the Senate on a comprehensive budget reconciliation package stripped bare of any pro-immigration provisions. While there is some satisfaction in the fact that the House did not get the higher L fees that it sought, this is cold comfort. Truth be told, it was a tough week, the worst in a long time, and the shock among pro-immigration circles, both on Capitol Hill and beyond, is palpable.
Removal of Section 8001 from the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report can be a temporary setback if we play our cards right. Congressman Sensenbrenner has long and loudly proclaimed that he is not against all immigration, just the illegal variety. Fine. Let�s take him at his word. He is, after all, the architect of the new E-3 visa that enables 10,500 Australians to get around the H-1B cap. Congressman Sensenbrenner has his enforcement-only bill now so he should be prepared to support us when we seek to attach Section 8001 to broadly bipartisan legislation in the upcoming session of Congress. If Congressman Sensenbrenner means what he says, and he usually does, this might be a golden opportunity to bring Section 8001 back to life.
Source: www.ilw.com (http://www.ilw.com)
Now we know how Tom Paine felt at Valley Forge. It has been a cold December for those who think immigration is good for America. On December 16th, the House of Representatives approved the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005(H.R.4437), perhaps the most draconian bill of recent memory, and, a mere three days later, the House approved an agreement with the Senate on a comprehensive budget reconciliation package stripped bare of any pro-immigration provisions. While there is some satisfaction in the fact that the House did not get the higher L fees that it sought, this is cold comfort. Truth be told, it was a tough week, the worst in a long time, and the shock among pro-immigration circles, both on Capitol Hill and beyond, is palpable.
Removal of Section 8001 from the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report can be a temporary setback if we play our cards right. Congressman Sensenbrenner has long and loudly proclaimed that he is not against all immigration, just the illegal variety. Fine. Let�s take him at his word. He is, after all, the architect of the new E-3 visa that enables 10,500 Australians to get around the H-1B cap. Congressman Sensenbrenner has his enforcement-only bill now so he should be prepared to support us when we seek to attach Section 8001 to broadly bipartisan legislation in the upcoming session of Congress. If Congressman Sensenbrenner means what he says, and he usually does, this might be a golden opportunity to bring Section 8001 back to life.
Source: www.ilw.com (http://www.ilw.com)
2011 the Funny Christmas page,
senk1s
05-14 01:14 AM
i just checked the profile ...'interesting' timeline to say the least
labor approved 1972
140,485 applied in 1970
I think we might be burning the midnight candle on this 'prank'
labor approved 1972
140,485 applied in 1970
I think we might be burning the midnight candle on this 'prank'
more...
sam5
09-11 11:45 AM
I am about to file for my 7th year extension with I140 approval. My contract will be renewed with end client, every 6 months and they will not provide me with any client letter, basing on their HR policies. Even if the client gives a letter it will show only a contract for 6 months. Is this needed, that I should produce a client letter for 3 years? My concerns are
1. My primary concern is will the 6 months project length effect my extension for 3 years. Will they extension basing only on the length of the project.
2. Do I need to mention the project length in the letter given by my employer on behalf of client
3. what are the documents relating to client, needs to be submitted for the extension. (I will not be able to produce the client letter, as they are not willing to give)
4. Can I take a letter from vendor, who is in between my employer and the end client. What should be clearly stated in this vendor letter. Is this necessary to mention the project lenght in this letter.
Appreciate your help in filing for the extension
1. My primary concern is will the 6 months project length effect my extension for 3 years. Will they extension basing only on the length of the project.
2. Do I need to mention the project length in the letter given by my employer on behalf of client
3. what are the documents relating to client, needs to be submitted for the extension. (I will not be able to produce the client letter, as they are not willing to give)
4. Can I take a letter from vendor, who is in between my employer and the end client. What should be clearly stated in this vendor letter. Is this necessary to mention the project lenght in this letter.
Appreciate your help in filing for the extension
kkt_tkk
07-31 04:09 PM
Hi,
I am also in same situation.
NSC,
E-filed EAD/AP on 6/26
NO FP
I am also in same situation.
NSC,
E-filed EAD/AP on 6/26
NO FP
more...
loku
07-23 12:15 PM
please reply ASAP
2010 of Funny Christmas Trees.
greendream
08-11 05:20 PM
Got an RFE to produce employment verification letter from my current employer. Yes, i changed the employer recently but didn't file AC-21.
Do you know how long USCIS takes to update the status online?
Thanks.
G.
Do you know how long USCIS takes to update the status online?
Thanks.
G.
more...
485_spouse
03-13 01:30 PM
I recently got married. My is currently on H1 and is currently in US. Will my wife's I-485 be returned as the priority date is not current I am in EB3 priority date is Mar 2002. Anybody in similar situation as me..please post...
you can not file I-485 for your wife till PD becomes current.
I'm in the same boat. you need to make sure your wife maintains her visa status. Since she is on H1 she should file a labor to make use of 7th year.
you can not file I-485 for your wife till PD becomes current.
I'm in the same boat. you need to make sure your wife maintains her visa status. Since she is on H1 she should file a labor to make use of 7th year.
hair Funny Christmas Cartoons:
achopra76
08-22 09:19 PM
hi everyone,
i wondered if someone could help me find answer to the following questions.
I am a Physician and currently in Residency program which is for 3 years. my residency ends on 30th September 2008 and i have H1b status. I have been offered Fellowship in my desired specialty but it starts on 1st January 2009, therfore there is a gap of 3 months between the end of my current job and beginning of my next job.
so my questions are:
1. H1 petition which I will file for my fellowship starting 1st jan 2009 would be an extension of my current H1 or would I have to file a new H1?
2. suppose I find a job for 3 months gap period at the same institution where I have got my fellowship (keeping in mind that decription of this job would be a little different from what i will be starting from 1st jan 2009), would i have to file for 2 different H1B petitions (one for 3 month period starting 1st oct 2008 and the other for fellowship starting 1 st jan 2009).
3.also, I was thinking that if I file for H1 approval say in july 2008 for the fellowship starting 1st jan 2009 and get approval by mid september 2008. with the approved petition I go back to India and have a vacation for 3 months and come back to US in late december 2008 on H1B again for Fellowship beginning 1st jan 2009. In this case, what would be my status for the gap period of 3 months that I spent in India?
also, would I be issued a new SSN when i come back again. also, i have heard rumors that US embassy in Delhi can hassle you to get H1. How true is that?
Is there any other option someone can suggest?
Thanks for your patient in reading my message.
i wondered if someone could help me find answer to the following questions.
I am a Physician and currently in Residency program which is for 3 years. my residency ends on 30th September 2008 and i have H1b status. I have been offered Fellowship in my desired specialty but it starts on 1st January 2009, therfore there is a gap of 3 months between the end of my current job and beginning of my next job.
so my questions are:
1. H1 petition which I will file for my fellowship starting 1st jan 2009 would be an extension of my current H1 or would I have to file a new H1?
2. suppose I find a job for 3 months gap period at the same institution where I have got my fellowship (keeping in mind that decription of this job would be a little different from what i will be starting from 1st jan 2009), would i have to file for 2 different H1B petitions (one for 3 month period starting 1st oct 2008 and the other for fellowship starting 1 st jan 2009).
3.also, I was thinking that if I file for H1 approval say in july 2008 for the fellowship starting 1st jan 2009 and get approval by mid september 2008. with the approved petition I go back to India and have a vacation for 3 months and come back to US in late december 2008 on H1B again for Fellowship beginning 1st jan 2009. In this case, what would be my status for the gap period of 3 months that I spent in India?
also, would I be issued a new SSN when i come back again. also, i have heard rumors that US embassy in Delhi can hassle you to get H1. How true is that?
Is there any other option someone can suggest?
Thanks for your patient in reading my message.
more...
bestin
05-18 12:10 PM
I would mention NO
hot Friday Funny Xmas 2010
for_gc
02-07 10:57 AM
Just saw this news on Economics Times (Indian Newspaper).
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/US_may_hike_H-1Bs_unveil_new_visa_for_the_unskilled/articleshow/1569190.cms
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/US_may_hike_H-1Bs_unveil_new_visa_for_the_unskilled/articleshow/1569190.cms
more...
house of funny Christmas cards
lostandscared
05-13 04:48 PM
Hi,
I was among those randomly selected for further processing in the Diversity Immigrant Visa (DV) program for the fiscal year 2010. Since I currently reside in the U.S., I filed Form I-485 ("Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status"). Upon having my biometrics taken, I had an interview with an Immigration Service Officer at a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) office. Because of a misunderstanding, I failed to bring to this interview an original Form I-134 ("Affidavit of Support") from a sponsor. Please note that my parents and sibling recently became U.S. citizens and are willing and able to be sponsors.
At the end of the interview, I asked the Immigration Service Officer if I can provide Form I-134 after the fact and he answered no. He made it sound as though a person gets only one chance at an interview with an Immigration Service Officer. He gave me a sheet of paper that had the following ticked off:
"Your case is being held for file review to prepare a decision. You will be advised by mail as to a decision on your application. No additional information is necessary from you at this time, however, if upon further review, additional information or evidence is required, you will receive notice in the mail. Please respond to any request in a timely manner. Failure to do so will result in denial of your application Please allow 60 days from today's date before making an inquiry on your case."
Questions:
1. Is there a way I can provide Form I-134 after the fact? If so, how?
2. If my application is denied, can I appeal the decision? If so, what are the chances of winning such an appeal and still finish adjusting my status before the DV program for fiscal year 2010 ends?
Thank you in advance for all your time and assistance.
Best,
LostAndScared
I was among those randomly selected for further processing in the Diversity Immigrant Visa (DV) program for the fiscal year 2010. Since I currently reside in the U.S., I filed Form I-485 ("Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status"). Upon having my biometrics taken, I had an interview with an Immigration Service Officer at a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) office. Because of a misunderstanding, I failed to bring to this interview an original Form I-134 ("Affidavit of Support") from a sponsor. Please note that my parents and sibling recently became U.S. citizens and are willing and able to be sponsors.
At the end of the interview, I asked the Immigration Service Officer if I can provide Form I-134 after the fact and he answered no. He made it sound as though a person gets only one chance at an interview with an Immigration Service Officer. He gave me a sheet of paper that had the following ticked off:
"Your case is being held for file review to prepare a decision. You will be advised by mail as to a decision on your application. No additional information is necessary from you at this time, however, if upon further review, additional information or evidence is required, you will receive notice in the mail. Please respond to any request in a timely manner. Failure to do so will result in denial of your application Please allow 60 days from today's date before making an inquiry on your case."
Questions:
1. Is there a way I can provide Form I-134 after the fact? If so, how?
2. If my application is denied, can I appeal the decision? If so, what are the chances of winning such an appeal and still finish adjusting my status before the DV program for fiscal year 2010 ends?
Thank you in advance for all your time and assistance.
Best,
LostAndScared
tattoo Funny christmas image by
p7810456
03-30 09:51 AM
I had the same case. My attorney refused to tell me the case number for my labor because according to him my application was owned by my company and they didn't want us (applicants) to know our case numbers. I tried looking for any alternatives, but nothing worked. As few people suggested me, try contacting BEC directly.. and may be they'll send you some snapshot or something, but i guess even if they do.. they'll send it to the attorney, not to you directly.
Neway, finally I got my labor certified last month.
Neway, finally I got my labor certified last month.
more...
pictures Christmas is upon us all,
Blog Feeds
06-05 02:00 PM
http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/border%20crossing.jpg
On June 1, 2009, new document requirements go into effect at land and sea ports for entry into the United States. Pursuant to the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative ("WHTI") an individual may show one of the following documents in order to be admitted into the United States:
U.S. or Canadian passport;
Trusted Traveler Card (Nexus, Sentri, or Fast/Express);
U.S. passport card;
State or province issued enhanced driver's license.
California does not issue "enhanced driver's licenses." (Enhanced driver's licenses contain multiple levels of security features.) It is no longer possible after June 1, to travel to Canada and expect to return with just a California driver's license. You must therefore have proof of citizenship as indicated above or proof of lawful permanent residence (i.e., "green card"), or proof of some other kind of non-immigrant status in order to be able to return to the United States.
For more information about the document requirements, please see my previous post on "Free travel widget helps plan trips abroad and return to the United States (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2008/10/free_travel_widget_helps_plan_1.html)." You may also go the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (http://www.getyouhome.gov/html/eng_map.html) website on WHTI to obtain further information.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/05/new_border_crossing_requiremen.html)
On June 1, 2009, new document requirements go into effect at land and sea ports for entry into the United States. Pursuant to the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative ("WHTI") an individual may show one of the following documents in order to be admitted into the United States:
U.S. or Canadian passport;
Trusted Traveler Card (Nexus, Sentri, or Fast/Express);
U.S. passport card;
State or province issued enhanced driver's license.
California does not issue "enhanced driver's licenses." (Enhanced driver's licenses contain multiple levels of security features.) It is no longer possible after June 1, to travel to Canada and expect to return with just a California driver's license. You must therefore have proof of citizenship as indicated above or proof of lawful permanent residence (i.e., "green card"), or proof of some other kind of non-immigrant status in order to be able to return to the United States.
For more information about the document requirements, please see my previous post on "Free travel widget helps plan trips abroad and return to the United States (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2008/10/free_travel_widget_helps_plan_1.html)." You may also go the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (http://www.getyouhome.gov/html/eng_map.html) website on WHTI to obtain further information.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/05/new_border_crossing_requiremen.html)
dresses funny/christmas-girls.jpg)
avizion
10-04 12:54 PM
my usual price is $75
more...
makeup dresses Funny Christmas
Blog Feeds
07-21 04:00 AM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
The fees for most CIS applications are astronomical. For instance the fee for N-400 to become a US Citizen is $675/- The fee for adjusting status to become a permanent resident is $1010/- Many people simply cannot afford that. However previously there were no forms and no guidelines to filing anything without fees with the CIS. If anyone filed a form and could not afford a fee, they had to write a letter. But the mailroom personnel at CIS either does not read or perhaps cannot read. So the form used to be returned asking us to send the check. You could go back and forth and in the mean time loose time or even status.
Even more egregious were fees paid due to CIS' mistake. For instance if the CIS in clear cut error denied your case, you had to file a motion to reopen for $585/- We even had a case once where the CIS collected a fee for a I-765 (EAD) filing for $340/- and lost the file. When we traced and send them the check, the reply was that my bank should ask for the money back. My bank, Bank of America, did not know how to. So we simply paid again and refiled.
Now the CIS is proposing a form: I-912 which will establish clear guidelines for fee waivers. Hopefully the form in its approved version will have no fee requirements for CIS' mistakes along with applications for applicants below the poverty level.
Don't just start spending the money that you were saving for the CIS fees yet though. Sometimes these forms take years to come to fruition. As for me, I will believe it when I ultimately see it.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-902000485481309751?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspot .com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/cis-going-to-issue-fee-waiver-form.html)
The fees for most CIS applications are astronomical. For instance the fee for N-400 to become a US Citizen is $675/- The fee for adjusting status to become a permanent resident is $1010/- Many people simply cannot afford that. However previously there were no forms and no guidelines to filing anything without fees with the CIS. If anyone filed a form and could not afford a fee, they had to write a letter. But the mailroom personnel at CIS either does not read or perhaps cannot read. So the form used to be returned asking us to send the check. You could go back and forth and in the mean time loose time or even status.
Even more egregious were fees paid due to CIS' mistake. For instance if the CIS in clear cut error denied your case, you had to file a motion to reopen for $585/- We even had a case once where the CIS collected a fee for a I-765 (EAD) filing for $340/- and lost the file. When we traced and send them the check, the reply was that my bank should ask for the money back. My bank, Bank of America, did not know how to. So we simply paid again and refiled.
Now the CIS is proposing a form: I-912 which will establish clear guidelines for fee waivers. Hopefully the form in its approved version will have no fee requirements for CIS' mistakes along with applications for applicants below the poverty level.
Don't just start spending the money that you were saving for the CIS fees yet though. Sometimes these forms take years to come to fruition. As for me, I will believe it when I ultimately see it.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-902000485481309751?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspot .com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/cis-going-to-issue-fee-waiver-form.html)
girlfriend funny christmas card sayings.
Anshika
08-21 11:58 PM
Hi,
Just Wanted to know if there is any bus ride from TX to DC ?
Just Wanted to know if there is any bus ride from TX to DC ?
hairstyles Funny Christmas trees
MatsP
June 8th, 2005, 07:50 AM
If you go to the first post in this thread, click on p_t_smiles, you get a menu that says, among other things, "Find all posts by p_t_smiles". When you select that option, you'll find a few posts. Just look through those threads, and you'll get some ideas.
--
Mats
--
Mats
EndlessWait
06-29 12:28 PM
We desis/chinese suffer because of too much population. To avoid the pain and sufferring we go through. Lets try and save our future generation from this mess.
pariraj
12-06 09:54 AM
Hello All,
My wife is in a similar situation where she was on F1 till Sept 31st (OPT) and now on H1-B (since Oct 1st). I have also added her as a dependent in my GC application and hence she has received her AP. We are planning to go to India in the month of January. Can she return back using AP? I have read in other threads that one can return using AP and there is no need to stamp your H1-B visa in the passport. But in her case, the H1-B visa is not stamped even once. Can this be a problem if she enters using AP? I would appreciate your advise in this matter.
Regards,
My wife is in a similar situation where she was on F1 till Sept 31st (OPT) and now on H1-B (since Oct 1st). I have also added her as a dependent in my GC application and hence she has received her AP. We are planning to go to India in the month of January. Can she return back using AP? I have read in other threads that one can return using AP and there is no need to stamp your H1-B visa in the passport. But in her case, the H1-B visa is not stamped even once. Can this be a problem if she enters using AP? I would appreciate your advise in this matter.
Regards,